In “A Brain in a
Vat” by John Pollock, Pollock tells a first person account of learning that it
is possible that the reality humans live in is just the motor cortex and
sensory cortex being stimulated as the human brain sits in a vat. The brain is stimulated
by a computer that creates a fictitious mental life. This life fits perfectly
in accord with reality making all humans unaware that it is occurring. This
idea of skepticism seeming has no counterexamples as the computer is perfect
and can account for all dissenting ideas.
What we must ask,
however, is whether or not it is worth it to believe this or any other skeptic
theory. For example, the brain in a vat theory is accepted and proven, I do not
believe it should change how people live their lives as it does not cause harm
or benefit them in any way. As we continue to live our lives as brains in vats,
nothing in our life will change; jobs, families, ideologies, and structure in
society will go unscathed. There will be those who become paranoid or begin sects
about the brain in a vat idea, but those people will be minorities compared to
the entirety of the human race. These groups will stay minorities because by
modern human nature we tend to stay with our beliefs and continue with their
normal lifestyles.
In retrospect,
skeptic theories such as the brain in the vat theory are not important to the
way humans do and will continue to live their lives. All skeptic theories attempt
to change how reality is and how it is perceived but these do not change how
humans will continue to be in the future. Humans have lived a stubborn
lifestyle for so long that the discovery of one of these realities to be true
would not cause a serious change in human nature.
Completely agree.
ReplyDelete