Are
we really free to make choices? This question had come to my mind a few times
in my life but I had never really given any serious thought to it. I had always
just had the belief that I was choosing each and every decision that I made and
that I was free to do differently if I wished. That nothing was controlling me
to do a certain things and that my decisions were completely free. It wasn’t
until reading and discussing this topic that I really thought about what I
believed and began to question what my previous beliefs had been and what might
be the actual cause to my actions. Many different philosophers have argued a
wide variety of viewpoints on the topic of free will. One of these viewpoints
is called determinism. Which argues that no actions are free by stating; that actions
are free when they are uncaused, and that all actions are caused, therefore no
actions are free. This is to say simply that every decision an individual makes
is predetermined, and was directly caused by something else. And essentially
that an individual’s future is completely decided and cannot be avoided. On the
opposite side of this argument there is the idea that humans contain a “special
sauce” or they are able to defy this idea of cause and effect and make
decisions independently of any causes. This idea supports that there are
transient, or natural causes, which is such that every event has a cause. And
then there are immanent, or agent causes that defy natural causes and they
incorporate this idea of human decisions. There are also other viewpoints in
between these two extremes that include compatibilist view point that states
that free will and determinism can coexist.
After all the readings and discussion I have
come to believe that this idea of compatiblism is what truly accounts for our
actions. I believe that our choices are very much caused in the sense that
there are circumstances that led to the decisions made. But the decision itself
is very much up to the individual making the decision. The way I see it is like
a pathway that at one point forks into two different paths, and the way to go
is chosen by the traveler, and further along the path that they chose is
another fork. The path that the traveler now decides to take was caused by the
previous choice and if they had decided differently at the first fork they
might not have to make this decision now. And again after they choose a second path
they come to another fork and this third decision was caused by the last two,
and if they had decided differently at either previous fork the decision now
might be different. So our choices are cause by previous decisions in the sense
that they lead us to different circumstances that would be different if we had
decided differently, but each choice we make is not forced by previous causes. Take
for example this blog post, the decision to write it was caused by many
different things, or forks in the path, and
each of those things was caused by others, like me choosing to come to Hendrix,
choosing to take this class, choosing to come to class the day the blog was
talked about, my nature to do my homework. All these things caused me to write
this post, and without these causes I wouldn’t be writing this post, but the
actual decision is of my own free will. I could have, despite all these causes,
chose to not write it and get a zero for it on my grade. Therefore I believe
that we are free to choose to do what we want but the options we have to choose
from are caused.
No comments:
Post a Comment