Suppose a writer want to write a
love story. They loved the concept
of romance and found it extremely heart warming. However they had never actually been in a loving
relationship. The writer had read
or watched endless quantities of romantic comedies and dramas, observed loved
ones and asked questions about their relationship. From all of the information they had gathered, the writer
felt as if they had come to realize the true nature of love. The writer was able to obtain all
physical information possible on the topic, yet they had never actually fallen
in love. Is he or she really able
to claim that they understand love?
Can a major league football coach able to play football? The Platonic philosophy claims that
only some subjects are permitted to claim that they understand the true meaning
of love. The Platonic philosophy
behind love is seemingly the most accurate compared to any other theory
pertaining to love.
So,
what is love? Plato defended the Greek theory of Eros, which states one strives
for beauty. One is able to find
beauty through a person, a hobby, idea, etc. and by discovering this particular
beauty, one is able to find true beauty in the world. The reason why Eros is such a precise definition is because
it claims that love is both physical and mental. There are theories that love is just strictly physical. The reasoning why one may love another
is only for mating reasons.
Another example is a mother who cares for her child. Without that caring quality, the infant
will most likely die without the constant acknowledgment and love from its
mother. For mating, without the
desire to mate with another species, there would be no children. This desire is a key element to Eros. The strive for beauty, which could be
through mating or taking care of a child, is a necessary quality for every
species. The mentality aspect of
Eros is technically the proper form of love. Although the physical quality is necessary, love is the
exploration or reflection of an idea, which develops into the pursuit of true
or ideal beauty.
One
of the major questions that I have pondered is whether or not love is
rational. I truly believe that
love exists but does it have any rationality. After learning more about the philosophy of love, I believe
that love is very rational. The
reason why it may appear irrational is due to how people act while in
love. Without love there would be
no thrive for anything really. We
do the things we do because we enjoy doing them for the most part. We love because we find beauty in the
things we love and enjoy doing. As
stated before, love is a necessary quality to keep children alive and to
mate. The idea that people do
irrational things while they are in love is actually perfectly rational. Although some people may commit extreme
acts to present their love for another, to them, they think that they are
acting in a rational manner in order to keep their love thriving. I am not agreeing with stalking or any
other poor ways of presenting love, but I can say that what they think they are
doing is rational. Love is a
beautiful, necessary and rational quality in which I am glad to have the
ability feeling.
Can people who have never been "in love" but have loved their mothers for instance, transfer that love into writing a romantic novel? Can non sexual and sexual love be interspersed? In other words, is the feeling of love different than the feeling of being in love?
ReplyDelete